The UT-Austin Student Rec Center - Austin, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | NEAL John P. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
2 | YOUNG Vivian | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
3 | FEINGERSCH Ariav (Ari) B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
3 | THAYER Jake T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
5 | LESCURE Dimitri | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | THAYER Bryce | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
7 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
8 | RUFFNER Blake W. | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
9 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
10 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
11 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
12 | BARGE Jackson | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | SAYLOR Harrison | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | WRIGHT Ryan | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | MAYHEW Clinton (Clint) M. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
16 | WILLETT Addison | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | FRENCH Timothy | D V V V V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
18 | VRUBEL Eli | V V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
19 | HOLCOMB Wesley | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
20 | TIEMANN Landen | V D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
21 | PEREZ Daniel | D V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
22 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
24 | SHETTY Surya | V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
25 | NGUYEN Wolfie (Khanh) | V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
26 | NEWSOM Finn | V V D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
27 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
28 | NGUYEN Bao | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
29 | WOODALL Ian L. | D D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
30 | KASKAN Peter E. | D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
31 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | D D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
32 | METEVIER Madelyn | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
33 | LIM Robert | V V V D D V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 | |
34 | HUANG Selina | V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
35 | FRIEHAUF Travis | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
36 | IMHOFF Alex | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
37 | VRUBEL Nathan | D D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
38 | NANCE Hogan | D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
39 | HORD Jacob | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
40 | OVERCASH II James (Coot) C. | D D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
41 | WILSON Kat | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
42 | YOU Joyce | D V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
43 | KENNON Katherine | D D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
44 | RHODES Zarah | D V D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
45 | QURESHI Shaheer | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
46 | GRIMSHAW Tim | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
47 | FRIEHAUF Benjamin | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
48 | JENSEN Jonathan | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
49 | SEYMOUR Phoenix | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
50 | PATEL Jai | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
51 | BARTON Christian | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
52 | RIEDL Luke | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
53 | HUNT Rylee | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
54 | MURPHY Violet | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.