New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZHENG Edward L. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
2 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | OH Triton | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
5 | SHOMAN Noah | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
6 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
7 | BERA Enzo | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
8 | BAE Jason I. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
9 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
10 | WANG Robert | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
11 | KESSLER Nathan | V V D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
12 | PENG Bryan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | IDRISSI Idris | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
14 | LIN Philip T. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | ZHAO Lucas | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
16 | PEREIRA Beckham | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
17 | CHENG Cody | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | LEMPERT Adam | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | EYBELMAN Ariel | V D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
20 | ALLARDYCE Lachlan | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
21 | WANG Oscar | V D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
22 | BROU Inkosi | V V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
23 | PARKER Benjamin D. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
24 | SAHAY Kenji | V D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
25 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
26 | ALLARDYCE Graham | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
27 | KIM Ethan | D V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
28 | GRIMM Benjamin | V D V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
29 | TVERSKOY Sam | D D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
30 | PRIMUS Nazir | V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
31 | GONG Jerry | D V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
32 | CARROLL Charles | D D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
33 | WITCZAK Mateus | D V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
34 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | V D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
35 | LEE Andrew | V V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
36 | SHINCHUK Daniel | D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
37 | LORIN Ike | V V D D D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
38 | YANG Michael | D V V D D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
39 | TSAO Oliver | D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
40 | CUSUMANO Neal | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
41 | SUBRAMANIAM Oliver C. | V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
42 | BAUMEL David | D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
43 | ATWOOD Griffin | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
43 | KLETTER Max | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
45 | BRANDT Jaden | D D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
46 | KANG evan | D D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
47 | SAKMANN Sebastian | D D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
48 | WONG Caleb W. | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
49 | ADAMS Rhys | D D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
50 | SUGIURA Samuel | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
51 | DESANTIS Benjamin | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
52 | OH Aster | D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
53 | BAUMEL Zachary | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
54 | SINGER Marcus | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
55 | LIU Alexander | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
56 | LIU Ryan | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
57 | DA GRACA Tyler | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
58 | CHANG Yuyang | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
59 | TAI Roebling | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
60 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
61 | VORONOVICH Aleksei | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
61 | LEVI D'ANCONA Leone | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
63 | MCWHORTER Alden | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
64 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
65 | TIAGI George | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
66 | MILLAR Matlock | D D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.