New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LUO Ashley | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | OSTROVSKY Emily I. | D V D V D | V V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 3 | BLIN Margaux J. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | BECCHINA Olivia | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | SMITH Grace L. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 9 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | SAAL Anna | V V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | FAZZINI Angelina | D V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | PAN Michelle | V V V D D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 13 | XU Jessica | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 15 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 16 | ZHENG Linden | D D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | GUZZI Jordan | D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 18 | HODGES Grace A. | V V D D V D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 19 | PAYNE Elizabeth | D V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 20 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | V D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | ANDREEV Victoria | V D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | PRIHODKO Nina | D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 23 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 24 | LONGSTREET Olivia | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | LI Allison | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | MAMEDOVA Farah | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 27 | MURPHY Chloe | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 28 | SHUKLA Tanya | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | SINGH Aayushi | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | RAMANATHAN Eesha | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | SHI Joyce | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | MURRELL Jessica L. | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | RHODY Evalyn | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.