Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 2 | WYNN Kylie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 3 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | ZONG Melody | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 | ZOU Ella | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 6 | ZHOU Joi | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 7 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 8 | DESAI Esha | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 9 | KIM Sydney | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 10 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 14% |
| 11 | SHUM Maya | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
| 12 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 13 | CHOI Kailyn | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 14 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 15 | DAI Iris Yuyang | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | LEE Abigail | 4% | 38% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | VILLARAMA Kara | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 18 | BHANGOO Paloma | 53% | 39% | 7% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
| 19 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | HAN Gian | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 21 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 22 | ANDONIAN Lauren | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 24 | SAH Madeleine | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LI Chelsea | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 26 | FAN Sophia | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LIN Allison | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LUCAS Ava | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HUGHES Liv | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | PENG Charlotte | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 31 | MONAT Jennifer | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | FANG Kelervia | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | JIN Jada Y | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | XIA Isabella | 2% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | CHANG Janelle | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KULKARNI myra | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | TEWARI Amaira | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | KIM Natalie | 17% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | CERILO Bella | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.