Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 2 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
| 3 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% |
| 3 | LEE Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 34% | |
| 5 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | |
| 6 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 7 | DOOLEY Atticus | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 8 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 5% |
| 9 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 10 | LI Linze | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 11 | BROWN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% |
| 12 | MINASIAN Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% |
| 13 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 14 | PADGETTE BRODY | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 15 | CHI Everett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 16% |
| 16 | TALLARICO Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
| 17 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 9% | |
| 18 | KANG Leo | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | KIM Suin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | SUN Eon | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 43% | |
| 22 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 24 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 24 | XIE Justin | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | PONOTH Arnav | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | SHEN Hudson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | AN Chris | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | GONZALEZ Paul | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | QI Zach | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 32 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 6% | |
| 33 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 12% |
| 34 | AMEN Oscar | 100% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | ELSAYED Yahia | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | TENG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | YANG Jake | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 39 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | NAZIF Laith | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LO Elroy | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 45 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 46 | SINGH Swaran | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | DING Orlando | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 49 | LIU Clarence | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | ZHOU Ruibo | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SAHA Aadi | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 52 | KIM Derek | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WU Dustin | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Leo | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | WALKER Camden | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | CHAO Stephen | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 58 | WU Allen | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.