Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
| 2 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 3 | SHANG Arianna | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 6% |
| 5 | GE Deanna | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 6 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 7 | MULLER Amara | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 8 | GOODMAN Carden | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 9 | MANGLANI Maya | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% | |
| 10 | POLING Katherine | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 11 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 12 | BENNETT Emi | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 13 | SUN Erin | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | GENG Emma | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | KIRBY Emelie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 16 | VO Evelyn | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 18 | KANDALAFT Emma | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | WU Annie | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LOPES Julia | 3% | 20% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | HUDSON Sophie | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | STEWART Isla | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | LENZ Phoebe | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 24 | IRWIN Juliet | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | GOMEZ Sofia | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | HENRYHANSON Violet | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.