Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 3 | CAI Xinyi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 3 | HU Alicia | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 5 | YUEN Nicole | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 6 | LIU Chelsea | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | HUANG Zoe | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 8 | MAJEWSKA Maria | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 9 | LIU Stephanie | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 10 | BORGUETA Madison | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 11 | HEATH Isabella | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | |
| 11 | WU Harper | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 13 | HILD Anya | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 14 | SARATH Sana | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 15 | WONG Charlene | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 2% |
| 16 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | WANG MONA | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | ZHANG Nikki | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | BHAVSAR Vanmayi | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHANG angelina | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | WANG Keira | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | PEREIRA Izumi | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 24 | BABB Virginia | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 25 | NAKATA Gwyneth | 15% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MALUKI Nia | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 27 | HU Sophia | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | KANIA Brigitte | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SIDERI Sophia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WANG-WARREN Josie | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | BIESIADA Sophia | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 32 | CHACKO Anne | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | YANG Selina | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | ESTEVES ZOE | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HUANG Megan | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | STOLCKE Saskia | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KONTOS Demitra | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | KONZEN Iris | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | FRANK Isabella | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | WILLIAMSON Morgan | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | BRAN ROSADO Victoria | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.