National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | SHI Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
3 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | LEE Kyle | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
5 | ESCUETA Tony V. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
6 | HARLEY Colby A. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | SINGER Carson | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | LILOV Neil | V V D D V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
9 | HAMMER Peter A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
10 | CHEN Brian | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
11 | ROPER Evan C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
12 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
13 | YAO Jonathan | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
13 | CHAN Matthew | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
15 | CHO Brandon | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | LASORSA Matthew | D V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
17 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | LUKASHENKO Darii | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
19 | CHIN Matthew W. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
20 | PARK Collin D. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
21 | TRAVERS Samir T. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
22 | LEMPERT Levy A. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | LIN William | V D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
24 | NG Jonathan H. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
25 | LUO ZIRUI | D D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
26 | JEAN Noe T. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
27 | KIM Avery J. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
28 | LU Timothy | D V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
29 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
30 | DENNER Maximilian P. | D D V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
31 | GILMORE Thomas W. | V D V V D D | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
32 | BERMAN Luca | D V D V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
33 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V V V D V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
34 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | V D V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
35 | BECKER Matheus | V V D V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
36 | ZHOU Justin | V V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
37 | ZHOU Kevin | D V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
38 | GRASS James D. | V D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
39 | GINIS Nathan | V V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
40 | LU Caleb Q. | D V V V V D | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
41 | ALTIRS Alexander | D V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
42 | BERRIO Carter E. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
43 | KENNEDY Liam A. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
44 | CHEONG Heonjae | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
45 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
46 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
47 | PAN Andrew W. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
48 | TONG ZACHARY | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
49 | LEONARD Cole | V D V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
50 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
51 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
52 | CONINE Tanner C. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
53 | MADDALONE Thomas | V D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
54 | YOU Jaden | D D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
55 | SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Colin | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
56 | REN Richard | D V D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
57 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
58 | HUANG Ethan F. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
59 | CHEN Oscar | D V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
61 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | D D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
62 | XUE ALEXANDER | V D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
63 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | DEISBOECK Maximilian S. | D D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
65 | GOLD Jackson | V V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
66 | JOHNSON Langston C. | D V D V D V | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
67 | WRIGHT Athan | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
68 | HWANG Ryan C. | V D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
69 | DU Gavin J. | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
70 | HOUSE Jackson T. | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
71 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
72 | COX Luis E. | D D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
73 | BLECKNER Noah | D V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
74 | CRISAFULLI Francesco R. | D D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
75 | FORT David | D V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
76 | COSGROVE Connor R. | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
77 | BONSELL Vance | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
79 | YOUNG Sean | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
80 | GHENEA George Philipe | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
81 | MOLINARO Lawrence | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
82 | SHEN Christopher | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
83 | CHAVES Matthew J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
84 | SHTEYN Mark | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
85 | WOODWARD Connor | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
86 | BURNS Jackson P. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
87 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
88 | COREY Michael A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
89 | BELEV Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
91 | BOWMAN James | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.