Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HARKINS Asher | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 2 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
| 3 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
| 3 | MCMANUS Liam | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 5 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 6 | MILES Greyson | - | - | 7% | 35% | 44% | 15% | |
| 7 | SHEHORN Connor | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 8 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% |
| 10 | KIMURA Ryo | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | KATZE Ashley | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 12 | MEIGHAN Joshua | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 9% | |
| 13 | MCARTHUR Kemp | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | EKMEKCILER Onur | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | CAO Kellen | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | ERBEN Samuel | - | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | LIU Hangda | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | CANTERO Erick | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | HUGHES Eric | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 21 | LITTLE Andrew R. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 22 | BOCKSNICK John Robert | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | GILLIAM Elijah | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 24 | BARRETT John | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 25 | WATERS Samantha M. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHEN Kuan-Ting | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
| 27 | OH Seonghun | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | TSCHOLL Dario | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | HERARD Weiman | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | MORALEJO Ivan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 31 | OLSON Clayton M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 32 | LOBEL Dillan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | LEE Katelyn | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | BLACK Elias | 15% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | MILLER Jonah | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | CHENG Emma | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | FLYNN Oliver | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LIANG Andrew | 29% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | CHEN Andrew | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | WERTH Mario | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | WANG Erica | 1% | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | CUOMO Jenna | 20% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 44 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 45 | ZHOU Hannan | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SOKOLOWSKI Olivia | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 47 | COUSINS Patrick | < 1% | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 48 | DESAUTELS Julie | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ANDUJAR Gerardo | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | BURT Stephen | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | LE BLANC Anna | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | HENDERSON Phillip | 19% | 52% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | MCGOWAN Ana | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.