Drew University - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 3 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% |
| 11 | DOCTOR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 12 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 17 | DAVIS Christopher | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 18 | PYO Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | ELKOUSY Laith | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 7% | ||
| 21 | BURKE Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 22 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 23 | GROSSMAN-SMISEK Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 23 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 6% | ||
| 26 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 27 | THOMPSON Alastair | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 18% | ||
| 31 | REZNICK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 17% | ||
| 32 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 34 | REYES Omar | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 35 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | DEGREMONT Henri | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 37 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 43 | MATHEWS Rocco | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LARA Diego | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.