National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 3 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 5 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 6 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 7 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 8 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 9 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 10 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
| 11 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 12 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 12 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 15 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 16 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
| 18 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 19 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 20 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 21 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 22 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 23 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
| 24 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 25 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 25 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 27 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 28 | ZHANG Judy | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | TRAN Thya K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 32 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 33 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 34 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% |
| 35 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 36 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 38 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% |
| 41 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 42 | IQBAL Sulphia | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 45 | MU Vicki Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 46 | LI Yadong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 47 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 48 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 49 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 50 | LU Yi Lin | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SU Emma | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 52 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 53 | HU Allison C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 54 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 98% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LIN Selena | 100% | 63% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | HUANG Sharon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 61 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 62 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 100% | 82% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 63 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 64 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | LU Amy | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BAKER Amelia M. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 71 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 72 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 73 | NI Sharon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 74 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | KANE Laurel A. | 100% | 80% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | DAVIS Charlotte | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 78 | STRAYER Sofia I. | 100% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 79 | GREENHALGH Abigail | 100% | 69% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | WU Cici | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 81 | MA Grace C. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | RODRIGUEZ Colette O. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 83 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.