San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 2 | THERON Zoe | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 41% |
| 3 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 5 | HOM Avery | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 6 | CHAN Ella | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 45% | 8% |
| 7 | LI Chelsea | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 8 | TAN Shouyin | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 9 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 10 | HSIAO Ariya | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 11 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 12 | JIN Jada Y | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | LAVERY Lucy | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% | |
| 14 | FANG Kelervia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 14% |
| 15 | HAN Gian | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 48% | 25% |
| 16 | BALOGH Ayla | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% |
| 17 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 31% |
| 18 | JOESUF Thea | 2% | 16% | 43% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | ARYA Leela | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 2% |
| 20 | AHN Hayley | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | SEAL Ayda | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | TEWARI Amaira | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 23 | XIA Isabella | - | - | 6% | 32% | 57% | 5% | |
| 24 | HOM Emma | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | IRELAND Moira | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | DVOIRIS Maya | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Sophia | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | DEJOY Leilah | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LI Audrey | 1% | 10% | 38% | 41% | 10% | - | |
| 31 | TAI Taphanie | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HAYLETT Emily | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 33 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 34 | PAWAR Sanvi | 2% | 19% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | CHU Lauren | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | YANG Byanca | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | LIU Madeleine | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ZHU Yunyao | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 39 | THERIOT Reagan | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | KIM Natalie | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 41 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 27% | 4% |
| 43 | YU Xintong | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 44 | JOESUF Aurielle | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 46 | KULKARNI Myra | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | - | - | 1% | 30% | 44% | 21% | 3% |
| 48 | KIM Audrey | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | WANG Ellen | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | YU-TAN Claire | 21% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | TANG Amelia | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | GUO Jianing | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | SARANGAN Ovia | 16% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LEE Clara | 36% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DONG Nancy | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LEBURU NagaVaishnavi | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 57 | ZALTZMAN Maya | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 58 | SUH Mia | 33% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | OSAKI Reica | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | CHHANYA Sanaiya | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | CHUNDRU Siri | < 1% | 13% | 44% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ARAKELYAN Marina | 45% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.