Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DENNER Lysander H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
2 | HARRIS Alex K. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | DENNER Maximilian P. | D V V V D | V V V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
3 | PAN Jerry | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
5 | MORREALE John | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
6 | YANG Richard | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
7 | LEVIN Mark A. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | LIN William | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
9 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
10 | PAN Jack (Yuxiang) | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
11 | CHIEN Phillip L. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
12 | WUN William | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
13 | NG Jonathan H. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
14 | JUN Ryan | V V D V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
15 | HUANG Eric | V D D V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
16 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | D V V D V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
17 | KIM Avery J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
18 | LILOV Neil | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | YAO Jonathan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
20 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
21 | WALKER Robert Connor | V V D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
22 | LUO ZiRui | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
23 | GREENE Alexander J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | SIMAK Joseph P. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
25 | LASORSA Matthew | V D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | LEONARD Cole | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
27 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
28 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
29 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
30 | JEAN Noe T. | D V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
31 | MAHONEY Colin M. | V D D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
32 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | D V D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | TAKEMARU Leo | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
34 | MORRILL Justin | V D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
35 | GINIS Nathan | V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
36 | CHO Sungmin | V V V V D D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
37 | STRONG Jr James S. | D V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
38 | CHO Brandon | D V D V V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
39 | LUKASHENKO Darii | V D V D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
40 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V D V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
41 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | D V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
41 | SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Colin | V V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
43 | KEEFE Duncan | V V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
44 | JI Cody Walter | V D D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
45 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | D V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
46 | PAN Andrew W. | D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
46 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
48 | MURTHY Mukund | D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
49 | LAU Jeremy Y. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
50 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
51 | ALTIRS Alexander | D V V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
52 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | D V V D V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
53 | HUANG Tyler T. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
54 | CHAN Daniel | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
55 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
56 | MORRILL William | D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
57 | LINSKY Matthew | V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
58 | ZHOU Kevin | V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
59 | HUANG Ian | D D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
60 | VON TULGANBURG Cameron C. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
61 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
62 | ZHOU Miles | D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
63 | BOURGHOL Matthew | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | LIU Kelly | D D D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
65 | CHAN Alexander S. | D D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
66 | TONG Zachary | V D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
67 | GREENE Cameron J. | D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
68 | LEE Justin | D V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
69 | HAQ Kamran R. | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | LU Caleb Q. | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
71 | WU Wilmund | D D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
72 | HO Kaden M. | D D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
73 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
74 | MICHNA Colin P. | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
75 | TANG Albert | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
76 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
77 | GORMAN Liam | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
78 | HAN Daniel Y. | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
79 | REN Richard | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
80 | CHANG Yufeng | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | HUANG Ethan F. | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
83 | HONG Vincent Q. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
84 | LEDERER Justin W. | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
85 | COOK Aidan J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
85 | REDA Myles | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
87 | CHENG Kyle | D D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
88 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
89 | MARTINEZ Justin | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
90 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
91 | SPRINGER Patrick | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
92 | CHEN Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.