San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
2 | HAU Olivia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
3 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
3 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
5 | POPOVICI Alina B. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
6 | YIN Gabriela | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
7 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
8 | SAID Riana | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
9 | LIN Ashley | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% | |
10 | SHU Muyang | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% | |
11 | ZIAEE Eimaan | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | |
12 | SOFAER-MORSE Xylia | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
13 | UMMETHALA Kavya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
14 | WANG Grace | 23% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - | |
15 | DALEY Keira | 7% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
16 | PEDERSEN Ava | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - | |
17 | BELFOR Allie K. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
18 | SALLEMBIEN Mathilde | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% | |
19 | GREWAL Veera | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - | |
20 | LEE Megan | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | |
21 | SAHI Jaya Emma | 3% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
22 | WAGLE Vaishali | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.