Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 2 | YAO Abby | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 42% | 49% |
| 3 | LI Joy | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 3 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 5 | LEE Zoe E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 6 | LIU Ashley | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 53% |
| 7 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | 1% | 17% | 52% | 30% | |
| 8 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 9 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
| 10 | XIA Isabella | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 11 | KIM Natalie | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | PARK Lauren | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 13 | TEWARI Amaira | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | LIM Kensie | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 12% |
| 15 | ZHANG Viviana | - | - | 1% | 9% | 44% | 39% | 7% |
| 16 | DENG Claire | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 46% | 11% |
| 17 | LI Audrey | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | TELEB Farida | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 19 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 39% | 43% |
| 20 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 52% | 25% |
| 21 | WANG Doreen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 22 | ZHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | TU Averie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | RUI Jessie | - | - | - | 9% | 45% | 46% | |
| 25 | CHENG Audrey | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 26 | AHN Hayley | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
| 27 | ZHANG Hannah | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 28 | GOWDA Siyona | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | JIANG Ziqing | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | AI Mirabelle | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | NICOLETTI Thea | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | JOESUF Thea | - | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 33 | YUNG Zoe | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 34 | DESAI Zoya | - | 2% | 20% | 53% | 22% | 2% | |
| 35 | CHEN Summer | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 36 | WU Gloria | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | FU Angela | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | < 1% | - | - |
| 38 | PAN Samantha | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | SCHULTZ Sumi | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 41 | LEE Abigail | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 42 | THOTA Akira | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | YANG Grace | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 44 | LI Annabelle | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 45 | CHO Rylee | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SAIFEE Sakina | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% |
| 47 | SMIRNOV Victoria | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 48 | FU Joy | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | KIM Audrey | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | SAIFEE Zahra | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 12% |
| 51 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | KHANAL Sarah | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 54 | LIU Sophia | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | KIM Ines | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 56 | TIAN Claire | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | FONG Isabel | 15% | 48% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | LIU Anya | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 59 | GOWDA Adisha | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 60 | LIN Avery | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 61 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | YU Xintong | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | POON Taylor | 38% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | LAI Olivia | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 65 | TANG Clementine | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LIU Madeleine | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 67 | SANTIAGO Rania | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | ZHAN Catherine | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 69 | LIU Mia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | WANG Ellen | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | CHEN Catherine | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | HONDA Emi | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 74 | LEE tara | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 75 | LEE Clara | 51% | 40% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 76 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 76 | ZHANG Katie | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 78 | PARK Aileen | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | KIM Chloe | 25% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 80 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 1% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 81 | DONG Nancy | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 82 | LUO Olivia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | SHU Kayla | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 84 | DEJOY Leilah | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 85 | JIANG Ziqi | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | LIM Kora | 7% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 86 | ZHU Claire | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | LIU Celia | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | ZHOU athena | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | KENT Audrey | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | GU Alexandra | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | YANG Claire | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 93 | STOCK Nina | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 94 | TAGNE Zoey | 6% | 35% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 96 | SHIN Ellie | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.