Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BABIAC Julia | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% | |
| 2 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
| 3 | SHENG Katherine | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 3 | WANG YiXi | - | - | - | 3% | 30% | 67% | |
| 5 | BROWN Lola | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 6 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 7 | FENG Audrey | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 8 | BING Charlotte | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 9 | HAO Danica | - | - | 4% | 25% | 55% | 16% | |
| 10 | CHEN Sophie | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 11 | VAUGHAN Norah | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 12 | LIU Long | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 33% | 4% | |
| 13 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 14 | ORRINGER Lottie | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | BERTOLINI Mia | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | LI savannah | - | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 34% | 2% |
| 18 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 19 | PUOPOLO Mia | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | SINGH Evangelina | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | TOROPOVA Arina | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 24 | POWLEDGE Cora | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 26 | LAO Sophia | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | GREENLEAF Ella | 2% | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | SULTER Aurelie | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 30 | LENZ Zoe N. | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 31 | LI Christina | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 33 | CHUNG Stella | 26% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | MULLER Amara | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | JANSSEN Juliane | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | - | |
| 36 | HUNG Samara | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 37 | GOLDBERG Talia | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | SHANG Arianna | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | CLARK Lillian | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | DEEKEN Anna | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | MANGLANI Maya | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | ZHOU Sophia | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | FLORES Heide | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.