University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAPADOPOULOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 2 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 23% | |
| 3 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 5 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 49% |
| 6 | GANSER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 24% | |
| 7 | ILYAS Ayah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | 2% |
| 8 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 21% | |
| 9 | POLANICHKA Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% | |
| 10 | FOELLMER Kristin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% |
| 11 | VAZQUEZ-LOPEZ Veronica J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 5% |
| 12 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | |
| 14 | GANSER Yuliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
| 15 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 28% |
| 16 | KANG Yenna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | WROBEL Julia | 100% | 97% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 18 | COLELLA Lauren | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | |
| 20 | NASON Amelia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 3% | |
| 21 | D'ANGELO Olivia | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | JEYOON Lauren | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | - |
| 24 | MEMON Insha | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 26 | WEI Sherry | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | DIAZ Brenna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
| 28 | LEVKOV Maita | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | CHEN Ava | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 9% |
| 31 | WHITTINGTON Kelly | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | COMBS Hannah | 100% | 92% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | BROWN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | 3% |
| 34 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 14% | |
| 36 | BANNERMAN Courtney | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 21% | 2% | |
| 38 | MURPHY Megan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 18% | 2% | |
| 39 | HOWARD Brielle | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | NAPOLI Eleanor | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | JULIEN Erica | 100% | 96% | 69% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | AZAD Ava | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 43 | FOMINA Polina | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZEHE Michele A. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | DURRELL Katherine (Kathy) J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 46 | GARCIA Alysia | 100% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | WHEELER Michele L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 48 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | KRISHNA Rithika | 100% | 88% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 50 | DUBROVINA Irene | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | WRIGHT Madison | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | GAVASHELI Margarita | 100% | 92% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | ERBER Liberty | 100% | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | IVA Sofia | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | NGUYEN Milly | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | KEFFLER Nadia | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | IYENGAR Sthuthi | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.