Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
2 | LARIMER Katherine E. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
3 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 7% | 33% | 44% | 17% |
3 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 39% | 11% |
5 | HURST Kennedy | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
6 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
7 | FU Linqian (Helen) | - | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
8 | FANG Victoria W. | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
9 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 2% |
10 | KONG Isabel | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
11 | HUNG Anna | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | JEAN Olympe G. | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | |
13 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 2% | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - |
14 | XI Shining | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 41% | 7% |
15 | MORAN Rhea | 3% | 26% | 47% | 21% | 3% | - |
16 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
17 | BIAS Lailah N. | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
18 | DAVIS Charlotte | 13% | 51% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
19 | HOLMES Emma | 30% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
19 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
21 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
22 | BELTRAN Emilia M. | 13% | 49% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
23 | SHANNON Sara | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.