Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DHINGRA Gian K. | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
2 | ERMAKOV Lev | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
3 | RESHEIDAT Malik | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | CHANG Colin S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
5 | BULL Anderson | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
6 | JI Cody Walter | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
7 | POPE Nico | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
8 | ZUBATIY Samuel | D D D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
9 | CONINE Tanner C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
10 | YANG Duncan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
11 | TONG ZACHARY | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | DU Gavin J. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
13 | CHOI Silas | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
14 | CHON Taylor A. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | CHEONG Heonjae | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
16 | KIM Alexander M. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
17 | JIANG Anthony | V V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
18 | ZHOU Brian | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
19 | LU Caleb Q. | V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | SHOMAN Zachary | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
21 | BONSELL Vance | V V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
22 | TANN Justin | D V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
23 | YU Thomas | D V V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
24 | RHEE Ethan N. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
25 | HOUTZ Jackson | V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
26 | GHENEA George Philipe | V V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | LEWIS John G. | D V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
28 | STONE Esmond A. | D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
29 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
30 | LEUNG Nathan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
31 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | V V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
32 | SHOMAN Noah | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
33 | WANG Andy | V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
34 | WANG Nicolas | D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
35 | QIU Nathan | D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
36 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | D V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
36 | CHEONG Heonjun | V D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
38 | ZHU Charlie | D V D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
39 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | D D V D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
40 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
41 | SHERES Asher | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
42 | RAJAN Advait | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
43 | PAN Alex | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
44 | KILARI Krish | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
44 | DUDNICK Christian | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
46 | FOWBLE Chance | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
47 | KOCHENSPARGER III Robert L. | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
48 | BYBEE Matthew | D D D V D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
49 | BRADFORD Tucker | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
50 | HUANG Alexander C. | D D V D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
51 | ROE Finnegan | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | LI Matthew | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
53 | XU Adler | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
54 | WOLFE Alex | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
55 | CARUSO Massimo | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
56 | YE Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
57 | BOWMAN James | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
58 | ZHOU James Y. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.