Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
2 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
3 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
3 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
5 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
6 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
7 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
8 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
9 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
10 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 5% |
10 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
12 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
13 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
14 | LEACH Meka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
15 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
16 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
17 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
18 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
19 | DANIEL Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% |
20 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
21 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - |
22 | BARRETT Elisabeth | 100% | 99% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
24 | YU Bailey | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
26 | LE Jennifer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
27 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
29 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 71% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
30 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 92% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | |
31 | SUN Ruilin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - |
32 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
33 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
34 | YERIAN Ayda | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
36 | LUNSFORD Ariana J. | 100% | 70% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
38 | SWECKARD Sophia | 100% | 77% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | ELLENT Victoria R. | 100% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | GADDE Neha | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
41 | MADHEKAR Krishita | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.