Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEACH Meka A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 5% | |
| 3 | BARG Margaret | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 5 | AHMED Khadijah | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
| 6 | TAYLOR Kylin | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | BARG Daniella | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | < 1% | - | |
| 8 | BARBARA Camille | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 10 | HAN Hannah Y. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
| 12 | GEVA Eliana | 16% | 45% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 13 | QIAN Irene | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 14 | MIRZA Annoshae | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 15 | LEE Camilla | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | SHIV Avni | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | LEE Olivia | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | BUSH emma | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 19 | VAN VACTER Madelynn | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | YERIAN Ayda | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | LEE REGINA | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | MADHEKAR Krishita | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | READ Lyla | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | KINDEL Amara | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.