Davis Fencing Academy - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MANDOKI Sandor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
2 | LUI Justin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
3 | LEHTINEN Axel | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
3 | MIETTINEN Pyry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 16% | |
5 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
6 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
7 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
8 | BHANOT Arjun | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
9 | BHATT Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 17% | |
10 | VAN SCOYK Aeron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 9% |
11 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 89% | 43% | 2% | - | |
12 | LI Austin | 100% | 80% | 26% | 2% | - | |
13 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 22% | 1% |
14 | SILVER Nicole | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | |
15 | BURLINGAME Owen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% | 7% | - |
16 | OSSERMAN Brian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
17 | PEGRAM Rafferty | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% | |
18 | EPSTEIN Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
19 | MAZZA Daniel | 100% | 95% | 61% | 8% | - | |
21 | WALKER Adam | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | MONOLAKIS Steven | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
23 | SAFTA Aidan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
24 | PARO Lewis | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 5% |
25 | DENSON Amenia | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
26 | HINTZ Rayan | 100% | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
27 | RAMIREZ Jordan | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | HAMEL Gillian | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | |
29 | HART Brennan | 100% | 89% | 38% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.