Division 1/Para Championships + April NAC

Div I Women's Épée

Saturday, April 12, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. - - - - 4% 28% 67%
2 FALLON Kyle R. - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
3 GU Sarah - 4% 19% 37% 31% 8%
3 ZIGALO Elizabeth - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
5 WASHINGTON Isis - - - 1% 6% 31% 62%
6 SPRINGER Sierra - - 2% 10% 29% 41% 18%
7 VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. - - - - 1% 17% 81%
8 KETKAR Ketki - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
9 WITTER Catherine A. - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
10 PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
11 KORFONTA Jolie - - 2% 12% 32% 39% 15%
12 WATRALL Christina - - - 1% 9% 35% 55%
13 WANG Ziqi (yoyo) - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
14 RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. - - - 4% 20% 44% 31%
15 DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
16 IYER Ishana 16% 42% 31% 9% 1% - -
17 SHEFFIELD Lake Mawu - - 1% 8% 31% 44% 16%
18 LIN Jessica Y. - - - 1% 12% 42% 44%
19 BECKMAN Ana - 1% 7% 21% 34% 28% 9%
20 CHIN Isabella - - 1% 5% 22% 43% 29%
21 PROFIS Liora - 3% 13% 29% 33% 18% 4%
22 CHEN Lefu 4% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1%
23 CAFASSO Natalya 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 6%
24 CHISHOLM Phoebe C. 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 2%
25 LEE Natasha - 2% 9% 24% 34% 25% 7%
26 YANG Alisa - - 4% 19% 40% 31% 6%
27 YOUNG VIVIAN 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8% -
28 NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. - - - 1% 8% 34% 57%
29 GUO Luxi - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
30 LEE Gloria Y. 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
31 KWON Athina - - 5% 22% 42% 27% 3%
32 BARG Daniella 1% 7% 26% 39% 22% 5% -
33 TOBY Natalia R. - - - 1% 15% 63% 21%
34 CAMPBELL Eva 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
35 LIU Charlene (Kai) - - - - 1% 17% 82%
36 AZMEH nour 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
37 KIM Zoe L. - 1% 9% 28% 40% 20% 1%
38 ABUELFUTUH Sama 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
39 HAFEEZ Hania 2% 14% 35% 36% 13% 1%
40 YU Nicole J. - 1% 9% 28% 40% 21% 1%
41 HABEK Sophia 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
42 SHIV Avni - 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 3%
43 LEE Scarlett - 1% 6% 23% 38% 27% 6%
44 LI Fei 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
45 PADHYE Tanishka - - 3% 18% 41% 32% 6%
46 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1% -
47 ZHANG Victoria R. - - 4% 21% 42% 29% 4%
48 MINOR Lindsey 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2%
49 FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana 3% 16% 31% 30% 15% 4% -
50 QI Julieanne 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
51 YOU Emily 7% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1%
52 SONG Angela 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
53 DESAI Meera P. - 2% 9% 26% 37% 23% 4%
54 CHI Chelsea - 2% 11% 26% 33% 22% 5%
55 NEMETH Katherine - 2% 10% 25% 34% 23% 6%
56 GOH Cayla 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
57 WANG Trinity 6% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
58 FURMAN Maria 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
59 SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle 36% 44% 17% 3% - - -
60 SMUK Alexandra S. 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
61 MEHROTRA Anya - 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
62 GEVA Eliana 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 4% -
63 RICHARDSON Meredith 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
64 MILEWSKI Nicole - 1% 9% 27% 38% 22% 3%
65 YAO Melinda 1% 7% 23% 36% 27% 7%
66 WANG Zoe - 3% 13% 28% 32% 19% 4%
67 HURLEY Courtney L. - - - - 2% 29% 70%
68 SEREGIN Katya - 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
69 KUMAR Eva 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
70 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
71 MCGLADE Jasmine - 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 3%
72 MUELLER Emma M. - 3% 16% 34% 32% 12% 1%
73 CAMAMA Tessa 5% 21% 33% 26% 11% 2% -
74 MARTYNOVA Diana 3% 17% 33% 30% 13% 2% -
75 CALDERA Lexi I. - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
76 STERR Isabella M. 12% 38% 35% 13% 2% -
77 WANG Karen 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 4%
78 PECK Maia A. 4% 23% 40% 26% 6% -
79 SHU Youshan 5% 24% 39% 26% 7% - -
80 WU Michelle 4% 17% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
81 WANG Jessie 8% 31% 37% 19% 5% 1% -
82 PRESMAN Aerin 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
83 CARRIER Meredith 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6% -
84 HANKINS Morgan 1% 11% 33% 37% 15% 2% -
85 POTAPENKO Margarita D. 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4% -
86 LEE Olivia 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
87 ZANGA Kaitlyn - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
88 WATTANAKIT Anda 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
89 YAO Yilin 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 1% -
90 BASRALIAN Azniv 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1%
91 SMUK Daria A. 3% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3%
92 STEWART Tatijana I. - - 3% 17% 45% 36%
92 GAJJALA Sharika R. - 1% 7% 27% 45% 21%
94 ELSTON Sophia 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% -
95 LAI Amanda 21% 39% 29% 10% 2% -
96 PULLEN Ayah 8% 32% 37% 19% 4% - -
97 PEHLIVANI Zara - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
98 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. - 1% 8% 29% 40% 18% 2%
99 CAPELLUA Mariasole - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
99 SMOTRITSKY Mia - 2% 11% 29% 37% 19% 2%
101 LEE Camilla 4% 23% 40% 26% 6% 1% -
102 HAFEEZ Hiba 3% 18% 34% 29% 13% 3% -
103 ZHUANG Lauren 30% 42% 22% 5% - - -
104 WANG Ziqiao (Claire) 12% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
105 HAUSHEER Kuncen 11% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
106 WELLS Tesla M. - 6% 25% 40% 24% 5% -
107 WONG Caitlin 16% 41% 32% 10% 1% - -
107 PHUKAN Indra 2% 17% 38% 32% 10% 1% -
109 LEE Claire 4% 23% 41% 26% 6% 1% -
110 SWENSON Nikita G. 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
111 XIONG Angelica 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 2% -
112 DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena 34% 44% 19% 3% - - -
113 NGUYEN Tallulah - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
114 WANG Victoria 31% 43% 21% 4% - -
115 ZHAO Alina 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
116 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. - < 1% 3% 14% 31% 35% 16%
117 FENG Iris 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
118 WU Jessica 14% 35% 32% 15% 3% - -
119 EDWARDS Auprell 1% 8% 24% 33% 24% 9% 1%
120 XU Jessica 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
121 BUSH emma 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
122 NEELAM Navya 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% - -
123 KANG Yenna 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
124 LEWIS Rachel 20% 39% 29% 11% 2% - -
124 KROPP Anne 26% 42% 25% 6% 1% - -
124 ILYAS Ayah 3% 17% 33% 31% 14% 2% -
127 KAUR Manroop 17% 36% 30% 13% 3% - -
128 KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita 10% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
128 BEAVER Ava 5% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
130 KANASKAR Ila 35% 41% 19% 5% 1% - -
131 DOROSHKEVICH Victoria 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
132 GIERAT-KATZ Izabella 45% 39% 13% 2% - - -
133 FENG Ge 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% -
134 WANG Sophie Y. 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
135 DUONG Zoey 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
136 SCHOR Elisabeth 25% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.