Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BHATT Morgane | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 51% | 38% |
2 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
3 | LOVE Georgina | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
3 | MCGRATH Polina S. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
5 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 47% | 46% |
6 | KERR Margaret E. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 49% | 17% | |
7 | BASSIK Judith M. | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 4% | |
8 | JOLITZ Cornelia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
9 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% | |
10 | MADDOX Lacey E. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% | |
11 | HERMES Kathleen A. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
12 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
13 | LIPPAI Sarah | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
14 | BOGDAN doina | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | - |
15 | TASKER Monisha B. | 3% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
16 | CHOY Ida | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 7% | |
17 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
18 | FERGUSON Diane F. | - | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% | - |
19 | THURMAN Allison L. | - | 5% | 29% | 47% | 18% | 2% | |
20 | LIPPMAN Soyeon | 1% | 21% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | |
21 | WHITT Lynnette A. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
22 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | CHUANG Jocelyn | - | 13% | 45% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
24 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
25 | GUNTRUM Pam L. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | - | - |
26 | FEDDE Rachel A. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
27 | HERAWATI Lili | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
28 | JOHNSTON Kim Johnston | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
29 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | STEVENS Joanne B. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | COMES Rita | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
32 | MOORE Annette | 9% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
33 | SOBISKY Kari | 3% | 53% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
34 | SAVOSTIANOVA Elena | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
35 | MARRELLI Carolina | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
36 | SUCHOSKI Annika | 3% | 37% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
37 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.