Los Angeles Convention Center - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FRANK Fred | D V D V V D | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | JENSEN David | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 3 | NIXON Mark | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 5 | AMELI Sean | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | SPEICHER Eric V. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 8 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V D D V | V V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 9 | DEW Eric | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 10 | VIEDERMAN Matthew (Matt) | V V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | SWANSON Dave | V D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | HUGHES Michael D. | V V V V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | VARNEY John R. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | PERKA Michael | V D V V D | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | D D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 17 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | RANES Evan | V V D V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 19 | KAROLAK Dale W. | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | KRUGER Mark | V D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | SWANN William A. | V D V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 23 | WATRALL Rick | D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 24 | LIMA Roberto M. | V V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | THISTLETHWAITE Doug W. | V V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 26 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | V D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 27 | MASE James B. | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 28 | POPPRE Michael N. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 30 | JUGAN Bruce M. | V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 31 | SEGAL Mark N. | D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 32 | MURRAY Stephen D. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 33 | ROOD Alex | V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 34 | BAXTER Daniel J. | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 35 | HAYENGA Gary M. | D V D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 36 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 37 | RICHARDS Dick | D V V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 38 | PIERRO Roger | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 39 | BALESTRACCI CHRIS | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | V D D D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 41 | CHIEN William | D D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | CHANG Henry | D V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 43 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 44 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 45 | EVANS Allen L. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 46 | TREANOR Donald K. | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 47 | KANE Tim | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 48 | BAXTER David | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 49 | BECK Brian C. | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 50 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 51 | PESTANA Juan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.