Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
2 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% | |
3 | SUN Emily | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 74% |
3 | KIM Sydney | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
5 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | |
6 | VILLARAMA Kara | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 3% |
7 | ZHOU Joi | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
8 | ANDONIAN Lauren | - | - | 8% | 35% | 46% | 10% | |
9 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
10 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
11 | ZONG Melody | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
12 | CHOI Kailyn | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
13 | TAN Shouyin | 2% | 16% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
14 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 3% | 28% | 47% | 21% | 2% | |
15 | HUGHES Liv | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 32% | 3% | |
16 | DESAI Esha | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 1% |
17 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 2% |
18 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
19 | XIA Isabella | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
20 | MONAT Jennifer | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
21 | FAN Sophia | - | 9% | 42% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | LIN Allison | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
23 | FANG Kelervia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
24 | YONG Rosalind | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
25 | LAY Apollonia | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | SAH Madeleine | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
27 | IDANAWANG Madison | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | GUO Audrey | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | - |
29 | HAN Gian | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
30 | LEE Abigail | 19% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
31 | CHANG Janelle | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | KIM Natalie | 10% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
33 | KULKARNI myra | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
33 | LI Chelsea | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% | - | |
35 | WANG Ellen | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
36 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
37 | KIM Lauren | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
38 | GUTIERREZ Gia | 46% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | IDANAWANG Allison | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
40 | CHUN Ami | 36% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | HE Ashley | 3% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
43 | CANTON Sara | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | BROWN Favianna | 35% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.