Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Sonia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
2 | HU Anna | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
3 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
3 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
5 | HUANG Doris | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
6 | NADKARNI Marisa | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
7 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
8 | FUNG Iris | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
9 | WU Yuwei | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% |
10 | JOHNSON Neema | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
11 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
12 | LIU Kelly | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% |
13 | DAVIDOVA Kira | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
14 | WONG Charlene | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
15 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
16 | SHMULER Fiona | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
17 | LI Tiffany | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
18 | SUNG Olivia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
19 | MYAT Chloe | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
20 | NG Sophia | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
21 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
22 | CAI Xinyi | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
23 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
24 | MULLER Inara | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
25 | FOSS Persephone | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
26 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
27 | NANDA Maanika | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
28 | JOHN Sophia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
29 | LI Yuluo | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
30 | YOON Sela | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
31 | REN Katherine | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
32 | KIM Grace | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | GONG Joy | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
34 | BAIK Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
35 | XU Elaine | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
36 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
37 | CHEN Victoria | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
38 | HU Heidi | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
39 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
39 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% |
41 | PARK Haylie | - | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
42 | DUTA Lyra | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
43 | KANG Soeun | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
44 | ZHAO Selena | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
45 | CHANG Norah | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
46 | HAGN Luna | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
47 | NARAYANAN Sinduja | 6% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
49 | WU Harper | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
50 | SEO Kaitlyn | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
51 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 8% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
52 | SU JOSERINE | 15% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
53 | HUANG Zoe | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
54 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - |
55 | HUANG Pierra | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
56 | ILAGAN Ava | - | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
57 | HO Sophia | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | ZHANG Audrey | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
59 | LEE Grace | 2% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
60 | BUCCINO Sloane | 63% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
61 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
62 | KIM Audrey | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
63 | KIM isabel | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
64 | IORDANOVA Vela | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
65 | WANG Selina | 13% | 44% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 6% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
67 | VATSA Shradha | 32% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
68 | PEREIRA Izumi | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
69 | BORGUETA Madison | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
70 | PHILLIPPY Hannah | 18% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
71 | LIU Teresa | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
72 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
73 | EDUSA Leilani | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
74 | CHAN Isla | 29% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
75 | LAU Teagan | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | NAKATA Gwyneth | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
76 | JONES Nima | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
78 | FONG Abigail | 35% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
79 | UPBIN Olivia | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
80 | KESSLER Amelia | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
80 | SHUMAN Ana | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | PATEL Sia | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.