Cobra Fencing Club - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 2 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 3 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 3 | MURTHY Mukund | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | |
| 5 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 6 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 7 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% | |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 9 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 10 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 11 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 12 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 13 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 14 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 15 | KAHN Justin M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | ERENHOUSE Walter | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | YEN Preston | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 18 | WALKER Robert Connor | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
| 20 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 23 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 23 | XU Michael | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | CACERES Hernan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 26 | FAN Andrew | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | CLAWSON Amzie | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | DREITLEIN Eric | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | SZEWCZYK Thomas D. | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | SEN David | 100% | 70% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.