Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAO Abby | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 2 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 3 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 8% |
| 5 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 6 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 7 | ESAKI Kei | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 8 | KIM Natalie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 45% | 15% |
| 10 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 59% |
| 11 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 12 | YU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 13 | SCHULTZ Sumi | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 14 | ZHANG Viviana | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 55% | 19% |
| 15 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 16 | JIANG Ziqing | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | DENG Claire | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 18 | ARYA Leela | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 19 | LEE Zoe E. | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
| 20 | LU Keeva | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 21 | LIN Avery | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LI Ella | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | LIGERET Stella | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | THOTA Akira | - | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
| 25 | KO Adeline | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ZHANG Annabelle | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 27 | WU Allison | - | 7% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | HONG Elsie | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | QIN Adriana | - | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | BOWDER Kate | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KIM Ines | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WU Gloria | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | LIU Anya | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 35 | LI Annabelle | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | SCHEFFLER Aria | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | KIM Rylie | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 20% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | KHANAL Sarah | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | KIM Ellen | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 42 | POEI Meagan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | YOUN Davina | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | EBY Sophia | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 46 | CHAI Aria | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | XU Zoe | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | FAN Lauren | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHAN Catherine | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | CHEN Bridgette | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KIM Olivia | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | TANG Clementine | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CROUCH Mira | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LAI Olivia | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 57 | PENG Yuerui | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | PENG Yuewei | 18% | 51% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | MORENO Alexsis | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 60 | JIANG Ziqi | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LIU Sylvia | 8% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | HUYBREGTS Matilda | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.