Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
| 2 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 3 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
| 6 | MATOS Lívia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 7 | HU Felice | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 8 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 9 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 10 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | YAO Ada | - | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 12 | LIU Nileya J. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 13 | WANG Jasmine | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
| 16 | ZELJKOVIC Anastasija | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 17 | YANG Iris | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 18 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 20 | ZHANG Alina | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 21 | GOOR Viviene E. | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | YURKOVA Mariia | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 23 | CASCONE Emily | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHOW Annabelle | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 25 | PEVZNER Nicole | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | BADLANI Diya | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | CHOW Tessa | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 29 | SHARMA Anyi | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | NEWSON Grace | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | CHEN Thea | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Jolie Z. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | ZHOU Sophia | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SHIM Grace | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Elaine | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | SHEN Emilia | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 39 | PAULUS Sloane | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHEN Renee | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Emma | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.