Hooked on Fencing - North Royalton, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
| 2 | CAMP Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 3 | COPELAND Nigel | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 3 | LINDOW Connor | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 5 | BOGARD Matt | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | ||
| 6 | HU Robert | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 4% | |
| 7 | SNELL Andrew | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 41% | 5% | |
| 8 | WANG Kaiyan | 2% | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | HERDMAN Julian | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 10 | JOBE Connor | 4% | 25% | 45% | 24% | 3% | ||
| 11 | ZHANG James | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 1% |
| 12 | BENARD Cormac | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
| 13 | LANDIS Geoffrey | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 14 | LIU Quincy | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | SI Anderson | 4% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | LASIYCHUK Nikita | 1% | 13% | 39% | 40% | 8% | ||
| 17 | MCCOY Lauren | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | HERBENER Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | - |
| 19 | WILLIAMS Richard | - | 19% | 46% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | WARVELL Jaxon | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 6% | 29% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | KIRKPATRICK Adrien | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 23 | RIVERA Ricky | 11% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 24 | BORSTEIN Lincoln | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.