Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 2 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 14% |
| 3 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 3 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 5 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 6 | CAI Jeff | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 7 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 8 | SAGE Nikolai | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 10 | LI Cooper | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
| 11 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 12 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 13 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 14 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 15 | HU Jayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 17 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 18 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 19 | GORDON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 20 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
| 22 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 23 | MARTINSON Torm | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 25 | EKONG-REID Severian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 26 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | KUSHKOV Michael | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | MELE Gianni | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | WEI William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | LEVY Jack | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | |
| 34 | GREENE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | LEUNG Arthur | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 38 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | JAGANNATHAN Ajay | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SUH Leo | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LIU Jayden | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | |
| 45 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 48 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 50 | YANG Byron | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | TASIKAS Peter | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | PERRY Xander | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | BANSAL Ariv | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | KULKARNI Ishir | 100% | 84% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 57 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | RIOS Alexander | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | PATEL Kiran | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.