Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GOH Cayla | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | OLELE Ifechi | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | FURMAN Maria | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | PRESMAN Aerin | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 5 | WONG Sydney | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | YOU Isabel B. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 7 | GOLIYAD Lisa | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | MONITTO Malina | V D V D D | V V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 9 | WU Michelle | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | XU Serena | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | V D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | LI Caroline | V V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 13 | FOMINA Polina | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | ZUCKER Emily A. | V D V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 15 | LOBANOVA Varvara | V V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | KOUAME Candice | D V V D V | V V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 17 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | NING Miranda | V V V V D V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | GANSER Nicole | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | V V V D D V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 21 | HOAGLAND Sally | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | QI Julieanne | D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 23 | RICHARDS Axelle | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | HU Constance | D V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 26 | ZHENG Erin | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | BOROTKO Katerina | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | LEE Eden | D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | YANG Hanting(Catherine) | D D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 30 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | D D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 31 | LEE Claudia | V D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 32 | QUADRI Saira | D D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 33 | PHELAN Gabrielle | D V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 34 | BAWA Jenya | D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 35 | SONG Charlotte | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 36 | MILLER Cassandra | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 37 | XIAO Katelyn | V V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 38 | CURRIE Keira | D D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 39 | NGUYEN Celena | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 40 | YAO Sophia | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 41 | TORRES AGUILERA Mika | D V V D D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 42 | JIANG chenxi | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 43 | PARK Suhjee | D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 44 | KRUG Ally | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 45 | ZAYKO Aveline | D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 46 | CHEN Allison | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 47 | SHABBIR Aiza | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 48 | ALVAREZ Martine | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 49 | GEFFNER Olivia | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 50 | SHEIKH PAREE | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 51 | DIBENEDETTI Isabella | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 52 | JONES Madeleine | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.