Duel of the East Coast ROC/RJCC/RYC

Div II Men's Foil

Sunday, May 4, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JIMENEZ Naveen 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 50%
2 URIBE GOMEZ Sebastian Javier 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 57%
3 STRAYER Andrew 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
3 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
5 HOLLIS Sean 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 33% 3%
6 DEEB Adam 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 45%
7 GRUNENWALD Henri 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
8 CHA James 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 21% 3%
9 ZHAO Ryan 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 19% 3%
10 STAFFORD Gareth 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 26% 4%
11 GROSS Liran 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98%
12 MILLER Dillon 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
13 CHOI Benjamin 100% 100% 96% 72% 28% 4%
14 YANG David H. 100% 97% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
15 SANTIAGO Elias 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 9%
16 PEDERSEN Charles 100% 100% 95% 73% 35% 8% 1%
17 XIE Jicheng 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 41%
18 LEE Thomas 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 6%
19 SENANI arjun 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 21%
20 ZHAO Brian 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
21 KENNEDY christo 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 15%
22 ZHAO Brandon 100% 100% 99% 90% 56% 13% -
23 LYNCH Owen C. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
24 DAVIDSON Elliot 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 39%
25 ZHANG Julian 100% 97% 76% 33% 4% -
26 LARGAESPADA LUIS V. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49% 1%
27 WEI JR Shan 100% 100% 95% 75% 40% 10% 1%
28 KOVACS Harrison 100% 100% 99% 86% 50% 16% 2%
29 ABRAMKIN Tim 100% 100% 96% 78% 39% 7%
30 GORLOVITZKI Amitai 100% 95% 60% 17% 2% -
31 LANGEN Carter M. 100% 100% 100% 94% 67% 21%
32 BAKSHI Aman 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 22% 2%
33 TANG xianchi 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 27% 5%
34 KIM Aiden 100% 97% 75% 37% 9% 1%
35 LEONG Samuel 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 13% 1%
36 GROSPERRIN Eugene 100% 100% 94% 71% 35% 9% 1%
37 SABATINO Patrick 100% 99% 87% 55% 19% 2%
38 BASKIN Lukáš 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 2%
39 MCLENDON Dario 100% 95% 67% 28% 6% -
40 STURGIS Zachary C. 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 18% 2%
41 KAYE Ben 100% 99% 86% 45% 12% 2% -
42 ROJAS Elijah 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1% -
43 MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. 100% 100% 95% 71% 27% 3% -
43 THOMAS Liam 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 7%
45 GODIN Willis 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 16% 2%
45 FALCONE Jack 100% 99% 86% 54% 21% 4% -
47 ZHENG Austin 100% 95% 62% 20% 3% - -
47 JABLOKOV Roman 100% 94% 65% 27% 6% 1% -
49 ELSAYED Ahmed 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
50 GATES Combustion 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
51 PISTEA Mark 100% 90% 56% 17% 2% -
52 NABI Masoud Masoud W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 36%
53 SHEA William 100% 96% 64% 21% 3% -
54 TANG Jeremy 100% 95% 66% 24% 2% -
55 LA BARR Edward T. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 27% 5%
56 BLACK Henry 100% 98% 83% 51% 19% 3% -
57 COSSROW Alex 100% 98% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
58 LING Valdis 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
59 BAS Jonathan 100% 87% 54% 21% 5% 1% -
60 OH Joshua 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
61 FEINBERG James Y. 100% 93% 62% 24% 5% - -
62 DA SILVA Jamie 100% 97% 80% 45% 15% 2% -
63 SINCAVAGE Louis 100% 60% 17% 2% - -
64 RUPP Keegan E. 100% 34% 5% - - -
65 D'ALONZO Jake 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
66 KIM John 100% 96% 74% 37% 11% 2% -
67 HOWARD Fox 100% 98% 81% 45% 13% 1%
68 CHAN Geoffrey 100% 95% 70% 30% 6% -
69 HECHT Joel 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 6% 1%
70 STRAYER Cody 100% 97% 69% 25% 4% - -
71 WEBSTER Declan 100% 72% 30% 7% 1% - -
72 FLORES III Walter 100% 57% 13% 1% - - -
73 NAM Justin 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
74 LIANG Haojia 100% 55% 15% 2% - -
75 CHING Ethan 100% 48% 11% 1% - - -
76 ZHENG Alan 100% 65% 23% 4% - - -
77 SEETOO David 100% 53% 14% 2% - -
78 MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent 100% 46% 9% 1% - - -
78 JENKINS Michael 100% 32% 4% - - - -
80 BRIDGES Nicholas 100% 73% 21% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.