Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
| 2 | BAE Yooju | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 5 | ZOU Ella | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 6 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
| 7 | CHAN Mila | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 8 | ZHOU Joi | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | LIU Samantha | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 10 | ZONG Melody | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | LENK Sophie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 12 | LI Joy | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | HO Addison | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 14 | KIM Sydney | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 25% |
| 15 | VILLARAMA Kara | - | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 16 | CHANG Lydia | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 2% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
| 18 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
| 19 | TAO Ann | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 1% |
| 20 | LIU Ariana | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 21 | PARK Lauren | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | ZHANG Viviana | - | 5% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 23 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | HUGHES Liv | - | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | SAH Madeleine | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LIM Kensie | - | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LI Chelsea | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | CHOI Jion | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 30 | SOE Hayleigh | - | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 31 | FAN Sophia | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | ZEE Savannah | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 35 | CHAN Ella | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 37 | KIM Lauren | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
| 39 | DESAI Esha | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | YONG Rosalind | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 41 | RUI Jessie | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CHANG Olivia | - | 7% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | GUO Audrey | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 44 | DENG Claire | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KIM Natalie | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | FANG Kelervia | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | HSIAO Ariya | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | TAI Taphanie | 21% | 53% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | MONAT Jennifer | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 51 | HAN Gian | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 38% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | LIU Ashley | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 54 | XI Sophia | 29% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | GROSSMAN Elizabeth | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | LING Camryn | 15% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | BUI Aubrie | 12% | 56% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | WANG Ellen | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WANG Doreen | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 59 | COLIC LANI | 56% | 40% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | CHUN Ami | 40% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | GUTIERREZ Gia | 55% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | CHO Rylee | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.