Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | LI Yidong A. | D D D V D | V V V V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 3 | GREMILLION Obadiah | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | TANI Tino | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | ANDRES Michael | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | YU Casey | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | YANG Phillip | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | CAO Oliver | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 10 | ZHANG Kaixuan | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | CHAN Henry | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | IYER Neil | D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 13 | HO Anson | V V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | LEE Nathan Uju | V V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | DOOLEY Atticus | D D D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 16 | MINASIAN Mason | V D D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | XIAO Brayden | V V V V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 18 | KOVACHEV Martin | V V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 19 | ROH Jaden | V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 20 | WONG Lucas | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | LIU Daniel | V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | LUC Cedric | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 23 | LI Ayden | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | KANG Matthew | V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | CHEN Cooper | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | CHI Everett | D D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 28 | LI Cooper | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | ROSALES Vincent | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | BROWN Andrew | V V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 31 | SUN Eon | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 32 | ZENG Vito | D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 33 | LEE Brian | V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 34 | QI Jeremy | D V V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 35 | GU Kevin | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 36 | TANG Morgan | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 36 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 38 | LI Linze | D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 39 | WANG Tiger | V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 40 | LI Ryan | V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 41 | VO Landon | D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 43 | IRVINE Patrick | D V D V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 44 | YUEN Caleb | V D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 45 | LIU Yijin | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 46 | HWANG Hagan | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 47 | LEE Alexander | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 48 | SEELMAN Cole | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | VAN ROY Ray | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 50 | YANG Jake | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 51 | GATTO Enzo P. | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 52 | BRADIC Andreja | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 52 | KIM Enoch | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 52 | KULKARNI Shreyas | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 55 | KATZ Nico | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 56 | HAOSONG Oscar | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 57 | NAZIF Laith | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.