Reno-Sparks Convention Center - Reno, NV, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
2 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
3 | DHAR Layla | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
3 | JIANG Evelyn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
5 | GAY Sasha | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
6 | BUSH Bethany | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
7 | BROWN Aria | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
8 | LIU Hannah | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
9 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
10 | GOLDIN Nina | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
11 | LONG Jessie | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
12 | DHAR Rana | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
13 | KANG Ellie | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% | |
14 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
15 | NADKARNI Marisa | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
17 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
18 | CHANG Norah | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
19 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
20 | YUEN Nicole | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
21 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
22 | OCA Merci | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
23 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
24 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
25 | ZHAI AMY | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
26 | KIM Grace | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
27 | XIAO Cindy | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
28 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
29 | SINGER Ellery | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
30 | CHANG Annette | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | ARNOLD Hali | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
32 | MAK Kaitlin | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
33 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
34 | BERMAN greta | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
35 | LIU kai yin aria | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
36 | JOHNSON Neema | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
37 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
38 | KINKADE Ellie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | |
39 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
40 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
41 | WANG Callie | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
42 | WONG Natalie | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
43 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
43 | KWON Hannah | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
45 | SUNG Olivia | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
46 | LEE Kaitlin | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
47 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 11% | 52% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
48 | MEYERSON Michelle | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
49 | YANG Caroline | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | KIM Saeren | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
51 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
52 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
53 | YU Skylar | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
54 | MAK Jayden | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
55 | YE Madeleine | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
56 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
57 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
58 | YU Stella | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
59 | KIM Satie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
60 | HWANG Charlotte | 13% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
61 | WANG Jiayi | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
62 | LOO Kaitlyn | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
63 | CONG Anne | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
64 | LEMMEN Jasmijn | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
65 | WONG Cerise | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
66 | LIU Hannah | 5% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | BORTAI Eliza | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
68 | WONG Charlene | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | LIN Annika | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
70 | GENTILE Vittoria | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
71 | KANG Soeun | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
72 | TONG Laurie | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
73 | FEENER Paige | 14% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
74 | LEE Alyson | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
75 | HUANG Neila | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
76 | DUFF Caitlin | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
77 | ASPIRAS Avery | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
78 | LEE Madeleine | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
79 | LIM Eunice | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
80 | KIRBY Skye | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
81 | MEFFORD Isadora | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
82 | YANG Renee | 72% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.