Reno-Sparks Convention Center - Reno, NV, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% | 
| 2 | FENG Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | 
| 3 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 
| 3 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 
| 5 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 6 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 7 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | ||
| 8 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 
| 9 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | 
| 10 | LI Alice | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | 
| 11 | ZOU Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% | 
| 12 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | 
| 13 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | 
| 14 | LUO Miranda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 15 | XIE Su | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% | 
| 16 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 17 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | POEI Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% | 
| 19 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 20 | ZHOU Chenchu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 12% | 
| 21 | BROWN Lola | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% | 
| 22 | THERON Zoe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% | 
| 23 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 9% | 
| 24 | DAI Iris Yuyang | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | 
| 25 | BAE Yooju | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 26 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 27 | KIM Claire | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 28 | KIM Sydney | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 29 | TAO Ann | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | 
| 30 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% | ||
| 31 | WYNN Kylie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 32 | ALKADI Mai | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - | 
| 33 | OH Ceana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | 
| 34 | HARRIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% | 
| 35 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% | 
| 36 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% | |
| 37 | DUAN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% | 
| 38 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | 1% | 
| 39 | HAN Gian | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | LIU Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 41 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 42 | LI Joy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
| 43 | CHAN Mila | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | 
| 44 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 45 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | 
| 46 | LIU Ashley | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | 
| 47 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 48 | HUGHES Liv | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 49 | EYER Brooke | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | 
| 50 | LEE Zoe E. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - | 
| 51 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 13% | 1% | 
| 52 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 53 | KIM Lauren | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 6% | |
| 57 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% | |
| 58 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - | 
| 59 | MARISI Gianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | 
| 60 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | 
| 61 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 62 | YAO Abby | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | 
| 63 | WATSON Evelyn | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 64 | HU Sophie | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 65 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | 
| 66 | YU Sophie | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 67 | CHANG Lydia | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - | 
| 68 | COLE Sofia | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 69 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | HOM Avery | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 71 | CHAN Ella | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | 
| 72 | AADHI Hansika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% | 
| 73 | SHIN Jaelynn | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 74 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | 
| 75 | CHO Karis | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 76 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 77 | SAH Madeleine | 100% | 81% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | TELEB Farida | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | 
| 79 | KNAPP Isabella | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | 
| 80 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | 
| 81 | DVOIRIS Maya | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 82 | SOE Hayleigh | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 83 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - | 
| 84 | KOU Elisha | 100% | 91% | 47% | 12% | 2% | - | - | 
| 85 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | 
| 86 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | 
| 87 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | 100% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | LAI Miranda | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 89 | FAN Sophia | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | 
| 90 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - | 
| 91 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.