Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 2 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 5 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 5 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 7 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 8 | WILSON Isley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 9 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 34% |
| 10 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 11 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 8% |
| 12 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | 6% |
| 13 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 14 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 16 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | |
| 18 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 19 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 21 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 23 | MAREK Sofia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
| 25 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 26 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 27 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 28 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | MU Vicki Y. | 100% | 79% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | LIN Angela | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 31 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
| 32 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 34 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 35 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | YU Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 40 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 42 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 43 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 45 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 47 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% |
| 48 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 49 | ZHOU Jacquelyn K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 51 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 52 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 53 | SU Emma | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 55 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | |
| 56 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 57 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 58 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 59 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 60 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% |
| 61 | PASHIN Anna | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 65 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 66 | ADEBANKE Niara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 20% | |
| 67 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 68 | KOTSEN Ava L. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 69 | REN Xinling | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 70 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 72 | LIN Selena | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | LU Amy | 100% | 83% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
| 74 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 76 | MADA Skye | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | LEUNG Emma | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 79 | WANG Audrey | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | MANGAN Lillian Marsh | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 85% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 85 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 87 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 88 | YAN Ava | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 89 | DAVIS Jordan | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 91 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 92 | SODANO Kylie | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.