Olympian Fencing Club - San Antonio, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KRAMER Jack P. | D V D V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 2 | HURME Tommi K. | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 3 | THAYER Jake T. | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | V D V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 5 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | HOLCOMB Wesley | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 7 | PETROSEWICZ Thomas (TJ) ". | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 8 | FEINGERSCH Ariav (Ari) B. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 9 | TIEMANN Landen | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 10 | FRENCH Timothy | D V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | V V V V D V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | LU Haoyang | V V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 13 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | YOUNG Vivian | V D V D D V | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 15 | BOURDEAU Emily B. | V V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | SOOS Whitman | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 17 | HUANG Selina | V V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 18 | OBREBSKI Kevin | V V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 19 | COHEN Nathan | D V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 21 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | D D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 22 | KANASKAR Ila | D D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 22 | TRACY James | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | CAVNAR Peyton | D D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 24 | SMUDA Alexander | D D D D V V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 24 | OLSON Joseph | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | SMITH Samuel J. | D D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | EMMERT Jp | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 29 | ULRICH Jacob | D V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 30 | MASOR Max | D V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 31 | POHL Philip | D D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 32 | CASTANO Helena | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | WILSON Kat | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 34 | SADLER Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.