Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
2 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
3 | HUANG Natalie | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
5 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 42% | 9% | |
6 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
7 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 8% |
8 | CHO Lorin Y. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
9 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
10 | WU Celine | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
11 | LEE Lavender | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
12 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
13 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 2% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 11% |
14 | BASSON Bayley D. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
15 | SU Michelle | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
16 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 6% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
17 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 29% |
18 | LIU Sophia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
19 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
20 | ROY Layla | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
21 | GU EMILY | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
22 | PAVE Claire | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 3% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | |
24 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
24 | FURST Chloe | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
26 | FELLUS Talia E. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
27 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
28 | TOBIN Brean | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
29 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
30 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
31 | SUNG Yoomin | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
32 | CHARALEL Jessica | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
33 | STAIKOS Eleni | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
34 | LIM Megan H. | 11% | 38% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.