Bay Regional Fencing Alliance - Freeland, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GOGOI Vir | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | PHILPOT Eden E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 3 | SANTOS Carlos R. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | 2% |
| 3 | KUE Temujin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 5 | LEE Ian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 6 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 6 | MAVANI Krishna | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | NAZARIO Dominic | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 9 | TAN Dorathy | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 10 | GREEN Zachary J. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | BASS Evan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | TATE Liam | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 13 | TATE Linus | 4% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | STEMLER Tyler | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | WILLIAMS Christopher R. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 16 | GORDON Kenneth | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | DRIVER Atticus | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 18 | BLAIR Kyle | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | NACLERIO Umberto Francesco | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | OXIE Matthew | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | METZ Evan | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MANKEL Kyleigh | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | ROSCOE Aedhan | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 24 | FOUNTAIN Enoch | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 25 | FOUNATIN Nolan | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 26 | HILYARD Evelyn | 12% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | FRANKE Timothy | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 28 | PALACEK Anna | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.