Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MUELLER Emma M. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 46% | 13% | |
| 2 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 52% | |
| 3 | BEEM Marin | 1% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 8% | |
| 3 | LEE Scarlett | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 5 | REID Anousheh | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 6 | HAFEEZ Hania | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% | |
| 8 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | FURMAN Maria | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | - | |
| 10 | SIRICHENKO Eva | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | YOU Isabel B. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | SZUPERAK Emese | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 14 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | HUANG Emily | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 16 | KUMAR Eva | 30% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.