Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | 7% | 50% | 42% | |
2 | YURT Leyla | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
3 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% |
3 | ZHANG Judy | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
5 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 5% | 49% | 46% | |
6 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
7 | O'HARA Eimile J. | - | 5% | 26% | 48% | 21% | |
8 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
9 | NEIBART Fiona | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
10 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% | |
11 | MADA Skye | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | |
12 | IQBAL Sulphia | 3% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - |
13 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 18% | 47% | 32% | 2% | - | |
14 | YUAN Greta | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
15 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 27% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | |
16 | WU Cici | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
17 | LIGH Karis | 33% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
18 | XU JENNY | 42% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | |
19 | MANTOAN Adeline L. | 7% | 52% | 37% | 3% | - | |
20 | MARKOV Jessica R. | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
21 | LIN Selena | 12% | 40% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | JENKINS Scotland | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.