Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOLBA Salma | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
2 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
3 | PAN Michelle | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | |
3 | BLAKE Caira | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
5 | SAAL Anna | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
6 | ZENG Katrina | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
7 | LI AnnieSiliang | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
8 | CHANG Ella | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
9 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
10 | BECCHINA Olivia | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
11 | MOK Chloe R. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
12 | DE JAGER Celine | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
13 | MING Cynthia | 15% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
14 | MAO Amy | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
15 | HICKS Grace | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
16 | OSTROVSKY Emily I. | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | |
17 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
18 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
19 | GAO Judy | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
20 | BANKULLA Misha R. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
21 | MOAIT Hebah A. | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
22 | LI Alisha | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
23 | LEE Anna | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
24 | KHITROV Samantha | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | XU Jessica | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | SINGH Aayushi | 13% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.