Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SAAL Anna | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
2 | BECCHINA Olivia | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
3 | TOLBA Salma | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
3 | MAO Amy | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
5 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 46% | 15% |
6 | CHANG Ella | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
7 | LI Alisha | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
8 | XU Jessica | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
9 | KOKES Ava | - | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
10 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
11 | GAO Judy | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
12 | XU Amy | - | 3% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 3% |
13 | PAN Michelle | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
14 | ZHANG Tina | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
15 | MING Cynthia | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | |
16 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 1% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
17 | MUELLER Emma M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
18 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 5% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
19 | LEE Anna | 10% | 50% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
20 | ZHENG Linden | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
21 | JOSEPH mikayla | 31% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
22 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
23 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
24 | YANG Karen | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
25 | ZENG Katrina | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
26 | PAN Iris | 13% | 47% | 32% | 7% | - | |
27 | SIRICHENKO Eva | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
27 | SINGH Aayushi | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
29 | BEEM Marin | 1% | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.