Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RIZKALA Joanna | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 2 | MAREK Sofia | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | GRINBERG Aliya | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | JIN Olivia P. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | PRIEUR Lauren | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | MIKA Veronica | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 8 | BAKER Audrey C. | D V D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 10 | YUAN Greta | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 13 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | V V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 14 | XIKES Katherine E. | V D V V V V | V D | 1.4 | 5 | +3.6 |
| 15 | SOURIMTO Valeria | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 16 | LEE Sophia | V D D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | D V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | PAUL Lila | V D V D V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 19 | SHIH Christina | D V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | GOMERMAN Sophia | D V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | V V D D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 22 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | V D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | JAVERI Amaya | V D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | JENKINS Scotland | D V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | MANSPERGER Leena | D V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | VADASZ Ibla P. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | DUCKETT Madison | V D V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 28 | ADEBANKE Niara | D V D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | NEIBART Fiona | D D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | NG Sarah W. | D V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 31 | HILD Nisha | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 32 | DANK Dina | V D D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 33 | LAU Jovana Y. | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 34 | YUN Emma | D D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 35 | LIN Selena | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 36 | MARKOV Jessica R. | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 37 | REN Xinling | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 38 | HE Xi | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 39 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | WU Helen | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 41 | MONTORIO Lily M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 42 | MARYASH Samantha | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.