DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CHI Chelsea | - | - | - | 9% | 40% | 50% |
2 | QI Julieanne | - | - | - | 11% | 43% | 46% |
3 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
3 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
5 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 71% |
5 | KROPP Anne | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 6% |
7 | WEI Sherry | - | - | 5% | 31% | 52% | 11% |
8 | MCCOY Lauren | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% |
9 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | - | - | 6% | 42% | 52% |
10 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
11 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 55% | 30% |
12 | MAGALSKI Mary | 1% | 8% | 35% | 44% | 11% | - |
13 | BERGMANN Beatrix | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 47% | 4% |
14 | FRENCH Phaelen | - | - | 4% | 36% | 46% | 13% |
15 | BECKMAN Amaya | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
16 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | - | - | 5% | 40% | 45% | 11% |
17 | BROWN Amanda | - | - | 4% | 26% | 58% | 12% |
18 | MORET Brighid E. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
19 | SHIN Jamie | 9% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
20 | DREYER Nadia S. | - | - | 5% | 39% | 44% | 11% |
21 | WOOLF Fredrika | 1% | 15% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - |
22 | KELSEY Fabienne | 7% | 37% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | GORDON Hannah | 11% | 49% | 36% | 4% | - | - |
24 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | - | 1% | 13% | 61% | 24% | 2% |
25 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
26 | GIFFORD Sally | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
27 | MURPHY Megan | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
28 | VETERANA Judith | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
29 | WHITTINGTON Kelly | 6% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - |
30 | SCHLEE Selma | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% | 1% |
31 | MERIWETHER Anne | - | < 1% | 6% | 35% | 45% | 15% |
32 | BRASTED Karen (Maggie) E. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 44% | 15% | - |
33 | POOLE Katherine | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
34 | NAPOLI Eleanor | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | - |
35 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
35 | WARREN Jordan | 3% | 28% | 57% | 12% | - | - |
37 | NGUYEN Milly | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
38 | NESTERUK Hope | 24% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
39 | MORET Teagan | 29% | 61% | 10% | - | - | - |
40 | IYENGAR Sthuthi | 65% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
41 | FONS Amandine | 48% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ASHFORD Marguerite | 8% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - |
43 | RENZ Sarah | 17% | 59% | 23% | 1% | - | - |
44 | PERKINS Zoe | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
45 | LOWMAN Amanda | 26% | 48% | 24% | 2% | - | - |
46 | BEACHY Megan | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | FONS Jennifer | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
48 | PAWTAN Carly | 61% | 37% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.