Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 2 | CHAN Alexander S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 18% | |
| 3 | GOSALIA Rishab | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 5 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% |
| 6 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | PATTON Colin T. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 12 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
| 13 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 3% | |
| 14 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
| 15 | DOUCET Justin P. | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 16 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | HUANG Ian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 20 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | LUO ZiRui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 24 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
| 25 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | GU Samuel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Henry H. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | GRYCIUK Koby | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 31 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.