Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOLMES Aiden G. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% | |
2 | PIISPANEN Eric A. | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
3 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
3 | GOLDIN Nina | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
5 | GOLDIN Lucca | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% | |
6 | RICH Augustus (Gus) G. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 36% | 62% |
7 | LEE River L | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 45% | 7% |
8 | GOGNA Rehan | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 37% | 1% | |
9 | LOPER Alex | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
10 | STATEN Joseph | - | - | 8% | 47% | 36% | 8% | - |
11 | ENGLE Aidric | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
12 | KING Robin E. | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | 1% | |
13 | YANG Caroline | - | - | 7% | 34% | 49% | 9% | - |
14 | PENG Gregory | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | - |
15 | NEARMAN Christopher | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
16 | CHIU Philippa | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
17 | NELSON Henry | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
18 | DIRSMITH Benjamin J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | 2% |
19 | WANG Tina | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
20 | ASHTIANI Shaya | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | - | |
21 | DEGEN Anita L. | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
22 | VALENTINE Rhys | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 1% |
23 | WONG Alice | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
24 | JOHNSON Jack | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
25 | REITER Michael L. | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
26 | TING Alexander | - | 5% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
27 | MCCLURE Logan T. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | - |
28 | BEELER Parker | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | |
29 | BECK Mica | 1% | 10% | 42% | 37% | 9% | - | |
30 | HOLMES Xavier | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
31 | HE Manni | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
32 | ARMSTRONG Doug | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
33 | VALENTINE Iain | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
34 | OTIENO Jamila | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 35% | 1% |
35 | RILLON Adrian | 17% | 47% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
36 | WHELAN Quinn | 33% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | DELIC Luka | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
38 | HARFORD Benjamin | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
39 | HOGUE Dillon | 9% | 36% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
40 | WEST Mia | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | WALCH Ryan | < 1% | 8% | 37% | 44% | 11% | - | |
42 | MUSSER Westin | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
43 | MAHAJAN Sanchya | 5% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
44 | GUEA Mark | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | MEYER Tamara | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
46 | KASHYAP Arunima | 30% | 48% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.