Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLMES Aiden G. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% | |
| 2 | PIISPANEN Eric A. | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 3 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 3 | GOLDIN Nina | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 5 | GOLDIN Lucca | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% | |
| 6 | RICH Augustus (Gus) G. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 36% | 62% |
| 7 | LEE River L | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 41% | 5% |
| 8 | GOGNA Rehan | - | 1% | 15% | 44% | 38% | 1% | |
| 9 | LOPER Alex | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 10 | STATEN Joseph | - | 1% | 9% | 47% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 11 | ENGLE Aidric | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 12 | KING Robin E. | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | 1% | |
| 13 | YANG Caroline | - | - | 7% | 34% | 49% | 10% | - |
| 14 | PENG Gregory | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 15 | NEARMAN Christopher | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | |
| 16 | CHIU Philippa | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 17 | NELSON Henry | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | DIRSMITH Benjamin J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 41% | 43% | 2% |
| 19 | WANG Tina | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 20 | ASHTIANI Shaya | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | - | |
| 21 | DEGEN Anita L. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | VALENTINE Rhys | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 1% |
| 23 | WONG Alice | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | JOHNSON Jack | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | REITER Michael L. | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | TING Alexander | 1% | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | MCCLURE Logan T. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 28 | BEELER Parker | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | BECK Mica | 1% | 10% | 42% | 38% | 10% | - | |
| 30 | HOLMES Xavier | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | HE Manni | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 32 | ARMSTRONG Doug | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | VALENTINE Iain | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 34 | OTIENO Jamila | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 35% | 1% |
| 35 | RILLON Adrian | 18% | 48% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | WHELAN Quinn | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | DELIC Luka | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | HARFORD Benjamin | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | HOGUE Dillon | 9% | 37% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | WEST Mia | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | WALCH Ryan | < 1% | 8% | 38% | 42% | 11% | - | |
| 42 | MUSSER Westin | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MAHAJAN Sanchya | 5% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | GUEA Mark | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MEYER Tamara | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | KASHYAP Arunima | 31% | 48% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.